Guided product walkthrough

See how Corentis Shield checks an AI-assisted complaints workflow before action.

This walkthrough uses a realistic financial-services complaint scenario to show how Corentis detects risk signals, applies policy controls, blocks unsafe actions, routes the case to human review and captures an evidence trail.

Request a walkthrough

How the walkthrough works

This guided product walkthrough is designed for funders, buyers, investors and design partners. It demonstrates the intended control flow and evidence model for a pre-deployment pilot.

Step 1

A regulated workflow is selected

Step 2

Policy controls are defined

Step 3

AI proposes an output or next action

Step 4

Corentis checks the proposed action

Step 5

Safe actions can continue

Step 6

Risky or sensitive actions pause

Step 7

Human review is routed

Step 8

Evidence is captured

Step 9

A pilot report shows what happened

The checkpoint flow

1

AI proposes

Draft reply, recommendation, case update or workflow action.

2

Corentis checks

Policy, risk, context, approval and evidence requirements.

3

Decision returned

Proceed, review, escalate or block before action.

4

Human review

Sensitive or uncertain cases go to the right person.

5

Evidence logged

Proposal, reason, decision, reviewer and timestamp recorded.

What this demonstrates

control before action
human accountability
explainable checkpoints
evidence without scrambling afterwards
clearer go/no-go decisions for pilots

What you will see

Sample report structure

What a pilot report contains

Illustrative

Use-case boundary

Control objectives

Scenario tests

Checkpoint outcomes

Review queue summary

Evidence log

Residual risks

Go/no-go recommendation

Control matrix preview

Policy intent turned into reviewable controls

Vulnerable customer disclosure

Pause direct response -> Human review -> Disclosure log

Financial difficulty signal

Escalate hardship -> Specialist review -> Support note

Unsupported complaint closure

Block closure -> Complaint handler -> Investigation evidence

Sensitive compensation wording

Require approval -> Supervisor -> Approved wording

Missing investigation evidence

Hold action -> Case owner -> Evidence gap flag

The walkthrough shows the intended Corentis Shield control flow for an AI-assisted complaints workflow. It is designed to demonstrate the checkpoint logic, escalation path and evidence trail before a live pilot environment is connected.